Overall
- Kennewick-Richland
- 100.1
- Cheyenne
- 96.5
Diff -3.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Cheyenne is 3.6% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland.
Cheyenne, WY is 3.6% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.5 vs 100.1). A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland buys about the same as $96,415 in Cheyenne; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:WY 100.1→96.5
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Cheyenne, WY is 3.6% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.6-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Kennewick-Richland is above 100 while Cheyenne is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Cheyenne 15.6 points lower than Kennewick-Richland. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Kennewick-Richland to $96,415 in Cheyenne, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Kennewick-Richland and Cheyenne share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 1.4 to 3.6 RPP points. Kennewick-Richland remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 17.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (1.8 to 15.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Kennewick-Richland RPP | Cheyenne RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.2 | 95.6 | 1.4 points Cheyenne higher |
| 2012 | 99.3 | 99.2 | 0.1 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2016 | 97.4 | 97.9 | 0.5 points Cheyenne higher |
| 2020 | 99.8 | 91.8 | 8.0 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2024 | 100.1 | 96.5 | 3.6 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff -3.6 RPP
Diff -9.7 RPP
Diff -15.6 RPP
Diff -5.0 RPP
| Category | Kennewick-Richland | Cheyenne | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.1 | 96.5 | -3.6 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 95.4 | -9.7 |
| Services | 93.6 | 78.0 | -15.6 |
| Rents | 94.8 | 89.8 | -5.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Kennewick-Richland would need to be in Cheyenne for the same purchasing power:
| In Kennewick-Richland | In Cheyenne | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,207 | $-1,793 |
| $75,000 | $72,311 | $-2,689 |
| $100,000 | $96,415 | $-3,585 |
| $150,000 | $144,622 | $-5,378 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.1 → 96.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Cheyenne is 3.6% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland. The overall cost index is 96.5 vs 100.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland has the same purchasing power as $96,415 in Cheyenne. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Kennewick-Richland are indexed at 94.8 while Cheyenne is at 89.8 (national average = 100). Kennewick-Richland has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.