Overall
- Kennewick-Richland
- 100.1
- Bangor
- 96.5
Diff -3.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Bangor is 3.6% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland.
Bangor, ME is 3.6% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.5 vs 100.1). A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland buys about the same as $96,432 in Bangor; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:ME 100.1→96.5
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -3.6 RPP
Diff -7.9 RPP
Diff +41.2 RPP
Diff -17.1 RPP
| Category | Kennewick-Richland | Bangor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.1 | 96.5 | -3.6 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 97.2 | -7.9 |
| Services | 93.6 | 134.8 | +41.2 |
| Rents | 94.8 | 77.7 | -17.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Bangor is 41.2 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Bangor, ME is 3.6% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.6-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Kennewick-Richland is above 100 while Bangor is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Kennewick-Richland to $96,432 in Bangor, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Kennewick-Richland would need to be in Bangor for the same purchasing power:
| In Kennewick-Richland | In Bangor | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,216 | $-1,784 |
| $75,000 | $72,324 | $-2,676 |
| $100,000 | $96,432 | $-3,568 |
| $150,000 | $144,648 | $-5,352 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.1 → 96.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Kennewick-Richland and Bangor share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 0.2 to 3.6 RPP points. Kennewick-Richland remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 24.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (66.2 to 41.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Kennewick-Richland RPP | Bangor RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.2 | 93.9 | 0.2 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2012 | 99.3 | 96.3 | 3.0 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2016 | 97.4 | 93.4 | 4.0 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2020 | 99.8 | 97.5 | 2.2 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2024 | 100.1 | 96.5 | 3.6 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Bangor is 3.6% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland. The overall cost index is 96.5 vs 100.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland has the same purchasing power as $96,432 in Bangor. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Kennewick-Richland are indexed at 94.8 while Bangor is at 77.7 (national average = 100). Kennewick-Richland has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.