Overall
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Paducah is 0.2% more expensive than Jonesboro.
Paducah, KY-IL is 0.2% more expensive than Jonesboro, AR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 86.1 vs 85.9). A $100,000 salary in Jonesboro buys about the same as $100,242 in Paducah; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair AR:KY 85.9→86.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Jonesboro, AR and Paducah, KY-IL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Paducah is 5.1 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Jonesboro corresponds to $100,242 in Paducah.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff +2.4 RPP
Diff +1.9 RPP
Diff -5.1 RPP
| Category | Jonesboro | Paducah | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 85.9 | 86.1 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 93.6 | 96.0 | +2.4 |
| Services | 75.0 | 76.9 | +1.9 |
| Rents | 53.8 | 48.8 | -5.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Jonesboro and Paducah share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.1 to 0.2 RPP points. Paducah remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 8.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (6.1 to 1.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Jonesboro RPP | Paducah RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 84.2 | 84.4 | 0.1 points Paducah higher |
| 2012 | 85.8 | 84.6 | 1.3 points Jonesboro higher |
| 2016 | 84.8 | 86.0 | 1.3 points Paducah higher |
| 2020 | 85.5 | 85.5 | 0.0 points Paducah higher |
| 2024 | 85.9 | 86.1 | 0.2 points Paducah higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Jonesboro would need to be in Paducah for the same purchasing power:
| In Jonesboro | In Paducah | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,121 | +$121 |
| $75,000 | $75,182 | +$182 |
| $100,000 | $100,242 | +$242 |
| $150,000 | $150,363 | +$363 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (85.9 → 86.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Paducah is 0.2% more expensive than Jonesboro. The overall cost index is 86.1 vs 85.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Jonesboro has the same purchasing power as $100,242 in Paducah. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Jonesboro are indexed at 53.8 while Paducah is at 48.8 (national average = 100). Jonesboro has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.