Jonesboro vs McAllen-Edinburg-Mission

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. McAllen-Edinburg-Mission is 0% more expensive than Jonesboro.

0% more expensive

McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX is 0% more expensive than Jonesboro, AR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 85.9 vs 85.9). A $100,000 salary in Jonesboro buys about the same as $100,022 in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 85.9 (Jonesboro) vs 85.9 (McAllen-Edinburg-Mission)
  • $100k in Jonesboro ≈ $100,022 purchasing power in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
  • Services drives the gap (+6.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AR:TX 85.9→85.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE AR × TX
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Jonesboro
85.9
Cost Index
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
85.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Jonesboro, AR and McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services leads the difference, with McAllen-Edinburg-Mission 6.2 points higher than Jonesboro. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Jonesboro to $100,022 in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Jonesboro
85.9
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
85.9
Goods
Jonesboro
93.6
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
93.8
Services
Jonesboro
75.0
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
81.2
Rents
Jonesboro
53.8
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
55.9

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Jonesboro would need to be in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission for the same purchasing power:

In Jonesboro In McAllen-Edinburg-Mission Difference
$50,000 $50,011 +$11
$75,000 $75,017 +$17
$100,000 $100,022 +$22
$150,000 $150,033 +$33
$ in Jonesboro = in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (85.9 → 85.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is McAllen-Edinburg-Mission more expensive than Jonesboro?

McAllen-Edinburg-Mission is 0% more expensive than Jonesboro. The overall cost index is 85.9 vs 85.9 (national average = 100).

What salary in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission equals $100K in Jonesboro?

A $100,000 salary in Jonesboro has the same purchasing power as $100,022 in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Jonesboro and McAllen-Edinburg-Mission?

Rents in Jonesboro are indexed at 53.8 while McAllen-Edinburg-Mission is at 55.9 (national average = 100). McAllen-Edinburg-Mission has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.