Overall
- Huntington-Ashland
- 88.4
- Goldsboro
- 88.5
Diff +0.0 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Goldsboro is 0% more expensive than Huntington-Ashland.
Goldsboro, NC is 0% more expensive than Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.5 vs 88.4). A $100,000 salary in Huntington-Ashland buys about the same as $100,045 in Goldsboro; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WV:NC 88.4→88.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH and Goldsboro, NC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents leads the difference, with Goldsboro 6.4 points higher than Huntington-Ashland. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Huntington-Ashland corresponds to $100,045 in Goldsboro.
Diff +0.0 RPP
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff +0.0 RPP
Diff +6.4 RPP
| Category | Huntington-Ashland | Goldsboro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.4 | 88.5 | +0.0 |
| Goods | 96.3 | 96.6 | +0.3 |
| Services | 87.9 | 87.9 | +0.0 |
| Rents | 51.3 | 57.7 | +6.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Huntington-Ashland and Goldsboro share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 2.6 to 0.0 RPP points. Goldsboro remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 10.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (10.4 to 0.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Huntington-Ashland RPP | Goldsboro RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 88.0 | 90.6 | 2.6 points Goldsboro higher |
| 2012 | 89.5 | 90.0 | 0.5 points Goldsboro higher |
| 2016 | 90.3 | 94.1 | 3.8 points Goldsboro higher |
| 2020 | 86.9 | 85.4 | 1.4 points Huntington-Ashland higher |
| 2024 | 88.4 | 88.5 | 0.0 points Goldsboro higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Huntington-Ashland would need to be in Goldsboro for the same purchasing power:
| In Huntington-Ashland | In Goldsboro | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,023 | +$23 |
| $75,000 | $75,034 | +$34 |
| $100,000 | $100,045 | +$45 |
| $150,000 | $150,068 | +$68 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (88.4 → 88.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Goldsboro is 0% more expensive than Huntington-Ashland. The overall cost index is 88.5 vs 88.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Huntington-Ashland has the same purchasing power as $100,045 in Goldsboro. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Huntington-Ashland are indexed at 51.3 while Goldsboro is at 57.7 (national average = 100). Goldsboro has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.