Huntington-Ashland vs Goldsboro

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Goldsboro is 0% more expensive than Huntington-Ashland.

0% more expensive

Goldsboro, NC is 0% more expensive than Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.5 vs 88.4). A $100,000 salary in Huntington-Ashland buys about the same as $100,045 in Goldsboro; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 88.4 (Huntington-Ashland) vs 88.5 (Goldsboro)
  • $100k in Huntington-Ashland ≈ $100,045 purchasing power in Goldsboro
  • Rents drives the gap (+6.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WV:NC 88.4→88.5

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE WV × NC
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Huntington-Ashland
88.4
Cost Index
Goldsboro
88.5
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH and Goldsboro, NC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents leads the difference, with Goldsboro 6.4 points higher than Huntington-Ashland. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Huntington-Ashland corresponds to $100,045 in Goldsboro.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Huntington-Ashland
88.4
Goldsboro
88.5
Goods
Huntington-Ashland
96.3
Goldsboro
96.6
Services
Huntington-Ashland
87.9
Goldsboro
87.9
Rents
Huntington-Ashland
51.3
Goldsboro
57.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Huntington-Ashland would need to be in Goldsboro for the same purchasing power:

In Huntington-Ashland In Goldsboro Difference
$50,000 $50,023 +$23
$75,000 $75,034 +$34
$100,000 $100,045 +$45
$150,000 $150,068 +$68
$ in Huntington-Ashland = in Goldsboro

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (88.4 → 88.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Goldsboro more expensive than Huntington-Ashland?

Goldsboro is 0% more expensive than Huntington-Ashland. The overall cost index is 88.5 vs 88.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Goldsboro equals $100K in Huntington-Ashland?

A $100,000 salary in Huntington-Ashland has the same purchasing power as $100,045 in Goldsboro. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Huntington-Ashland and Goldsboro?

Rents in Huntington-Ashland are indexed at 51.3 while Goldsboro is at 57.7 (national average = 100). Goldsboro has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.