Goldsboro vs Huntington-Ashland

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Huntington-Ashland is 0% less expensive than Goldsboro.

0% less expensive

Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH is 0% less expensive than Goldsboro, NC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.4 vs 88.5). A $100,000 salary in Goldsboro buys about the same as $99,955 in Huntington-Ashland; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 88.5 (Goldsboro) vs 88.4 (Huntington-Ashland)
  • $100k in Goldsboro ≈ $99,955 purchasing power in Huntington-Ashland
  • Rents drives the gap (-6.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair NC:WV 88.5→88.4

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE NC × WV
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Goldsboro
88.5
Cost Index
Huntington-Ashland
88.4
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Goldsboro, NC and Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents leads the difference, with Huntington-Ashland 6.4 points lower than Goldsboro. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Goldsboro corresponds to $99,955 in Huntington-Ashland.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Goldsboro
88.5
Huntington-Ashland
88.4
Goods
Goldsboro
96.6
Huntington-Ashland
96.3
Services
Goldsboro
87.9
Huntington-Ashland
87.9
Rents
Goldsboro
57.7
Huntington-Ashland
51.3

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Goldsboro would need to be in Huntington-Ashland for the same purchasing power:

In Goldsboro In Huntington-Ashland Difference
$50,000 $49,977 $-23
$75,000 $74,966 $-34
$100,000 $99,955 $-45
$150,000 $149,932 $-68
$ in Goldsboro = in Huntington-Ashland

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (88.5 → 88.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Huntington-Ashland more expensive than Goldsboro?

Huntington-Ashland is 0% less expensive than Goldsboro. The overall cost index is 88.4 vs 88.5 (national average = 100).

What salary in Huntington-Ashland equals $100K in Goldsboro?

A $100,000 salary in Goldsboro has the same purchasing power as $99,955 in Huntington-Ashland. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Goldsboro and Huntington-Ashland?

Rents in Goldsboro are indexed at 57.7 while Huntington-Ashland is at 51.3 (national average = 100). Goldsboro has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.