Overall
Diff -2.7 RPP
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands vs Racine-Mount Pleasant
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Racine-Mount Pleasant is 2.7% less expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands.
2.7% less expensive
Racine-Mount Pleasant, WI is 2.7% less expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.0 vs 98.6). A $100,000 salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands buys about the same as $97,295 in Racine-Mount Pleasant; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 98.6 (Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands) vs 96.0 (Racine-Mount Pleasant)
- $100k in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands ≈ $97,295 purchasing power in Racine-Mount Pleasant
- Rents drives the gap (-12.5 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:WI 98.6→96.0
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE TX × WI
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands would need to be in Racine-Mount Pleasant for the same purchasing power:
| In Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands | In Racine-Mount Pleasant | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,647 | $-1,353 |
| $75,000 | $72,971 | $-2,029 |
| $100,000 | $97,295 | $-2,705 |
| $150,000 | $145,942 | $-4,058 |
$ in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands = in Racine-Mount Pleasant
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.6 → 96.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Racine-Mount Pleasant, WI is 2.7% less expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.7-point overall gap.
Rents leads the difference, with Racine-Mount Pleasant 12.5 points lower than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands corresponds to $97,295 in Racine-Mount Pleasant.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff -6.9 RPP
Services
Diff -5.3 RPP
Rents
Diff -12.5 RPP
| Category | Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands | Racine-Mount Pleasant | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.6 | 96.0 | -2.7 |
| Goods | 100.6 | 93.8 | -6.9 |
| Services | 95.3 | 90.0 | -5.3 |
| Rents | 104.5 | 92.0 | -12.5 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 98.6
Racine-Mount Pleasant 96.0
Goods
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 100.6
Racine-Mount Pleasant 93.8
Services
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 95.3
Racine-Mount Pleasant 90.0
Rents
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 104.5
Racine-Mount Pleasant 92.0
Vertical line = national average (100)
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
98.6
Cost Index
Racine-Mount Pleasant
96.0
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands and Racine-Mount Pleasant share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 3.1 to 2.7 RPP points. Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 8.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (3.5 to 5.3 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands RPP | Racine-Mount Pleasant RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.4 | 96.3 | 3.1 points Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands higher |
| 2012 | 100.0 | 94.4 | 5.6 points Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands higher |
| 2016 | 102.4 | 94.6 | 7.7 points Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands higher |
| 2020 | 100.0 | 93.9 | 6.1 points Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands higher |
| 2024 | 98.6 | 96.0 | 2.7 points Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Racine-Mount Pleasant more expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands?
Racine-Mount Pleasant is 2.7% less expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands. The overall cost index is 96.0 vs 98.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Racine-Mount Pleasant equals $100K in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands?
A $100,000 salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands has the same purchasing power as $97,295 in Racine-Mount Pleasant. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands and Racine-Mount Pleasant?
Rents in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands are indexed at 104.5 while Racine-Mount Pleasant is at 92.0 (national average = 100). Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.