Overall
- Manchester-Nashua
- 105.7
Diff +7.0 RPP
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands vs Manchester-Nashua
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Manchester-Nashua is 7.1% more expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands.
7.1% more expensive
Manchester-Nashua, NH is 7.1% more expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 105.7 vs 98.6). A $100,000 salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands buys about the same as $107,126 in Manchester-Nashua; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 98.6 (Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands) vs 105.7 (Manchester-Nashua)
- $100k in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands ≈ $107,126 purchasing power in Manchester-Nashua
- Services drives the gap (+38.2 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:NH 98.6→105.7
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE TX × NH
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Manchester-Nashua
- 97.7
Diff -3.0 RPP
Services
- Manchester-Nashua
- 133.5
Diff +38.2 RPP
Rents
- Manchester-Nashua
- 134.2
Diff +29.7 RPP
| Category | Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands | Manchester-Nashua | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.6 | 105.7 | +7.0 |
| Goods | 100.6 | 97.7 | -3.0 |
| Services | 95.3 | 133.5 | +38.2 |
| Rents | 104.5 | 134.2 | +29.7 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 98.6
Manchester-Nashua 105.7
Goods
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 100.6
Manchester-Nashua 97.7
Services
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 95.3
Manchester-Nashua 133.5
Rents
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 104.5
Manchester-Nashua 134.2
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Services creates the largest separation: Manchester-Nashua is 38.2 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Manchester-Nashua, NH is 7.1% more expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 7.0-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Manchester-Nashua is above 100 while Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands to $107,126 in Manchester-Nashua, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
98.6
Cost Index
Manchester-Nashua
105.7
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands would need to be in Manchester-Nashua for the same purchasing power:
| In Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands | In Manchester-Nashua | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,563 | +$3,563 |
| $75,000 | $80,344 | +$5,344 |
| $100,000 | $107,126 | +$7,126 |
| $150,000 | $160,689 | +$10,689 |
$ in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands = in Manchester-Nashua
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.6 → 105.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
How the Price Gap Changed
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands and Manchester-Nashua share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 9.6 to 7.0 RPP points. Manchester-Nashua remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 9.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (39.5 to 29.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands RPP | Manchester-Nashua RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.4 | 109.0 | 9.6 points Manchester-Nashua higher |
| 2012 | 100.0 | 104.2 | 4.1 points Manchester-Nashua higher |
| 2016 | 102.4 | 108.0 | 5.6 points Manchester-Nashua higher |
| 2020 | 100.0 | 104.8 | 4.8 points Manchester-Nashua higher |
| 2024 | 98.6 | 105.7 | 7.0 points Manchester-Nashua higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Manchester-Nashua more expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands?
Manchester-Nashua is 7.1% more expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands. The overall cost index is 105.7 vs 98.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Manchester-Nashua equals $100K in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands?
A $100,000 salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands has the same purchasing power as $107,126 in Manchester-Nashua. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands and Manchester-Nashua?
Rents in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands are indexed at 104.5 while Manchester-Nashua is at 134.2 (national average = 100). Manchester-Nashua has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.