Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands vs Brunswick-St. Simons

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Brunswick-St. Simons is 11.1% less expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX at an overall Regional Price Parity of 98.6 and Brunswick-St. Simons, GA at 87.7, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Brunswick-St. Simons 11.1% less expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 10.9 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands indexes goods at 100.6, services at 95.3, and rents at 104.5, while Brunswick-St. Simons comes in at 96.3, 87.3, and 56.3 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall — Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands has the same purchasing power as $88,927 in Brunswick-St. Simons based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 7,274,714 (Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands) and 114,345 (Brunswick-St. Simons), and median household incomes are $80,458 versus $64,819 respectively — so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
98.6
Cost Index
Brunswick-St. Simons
87.7
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands Brunswick-St. Simons Difference
Overall 98.6 87.7 -10.9
Goods 100.6 96.3 -4.4
Services 95.3 87.3 -8.0
Rents 104.5 56.3 -48.2

Visual Comparison

Overall
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
98.6
Brunswick-St. Simons
87.7
Goods
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
100.6
Brunswick-St. Simons
96.3
Services
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
95.3
Brunswick-St. Simons
87.3
Rents
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
104.5
Brunswick-St. Simons
56.3

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands would need to be in Brunswick-St. Simons for the same purchasing power:

In Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands In Brunswick-St. Simons Difference
$50,000 $44,464 $-5,536
$75,000 $66,695 $-8,305
$100,000 $88,927 $-11,073
$150,000 $133,391 $-16,609

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands Brunswick-St. Simons
Population 7,274,714 114,345
Median Income $80,458 $64,819
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Brunswick-St. Simons more expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands?
Brunswick-St. Simons is 11.1% less expensive than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands. The overall cost index is 87.7 vs 98.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Brunswick-St. Simons equals $100K in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands?
A $100,000 salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands has the same purchasing power as $88,927 in Brunswick-St. Simons. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands and Brunswick-St. Simons?
Rents in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands are indexed at 104.5 while Brunswick-St. Simons is at 56.3 (national average = 100). Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial