Overall
- Harrisburg-Carlisle
- 98.7
- La Crosse-Onalaska
- 91.8
Diff -6.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. La Crosse-Onalaska is 7% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle.
La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN is 7% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.8 vs 98.7). A $100,000 salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle buys about the same as $93,025 in La Crosse-Onalaska; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair PA:WI 98.7→91.8
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle would need to be in La Crosse-Onalaska for the same purchasing power:
| In Harrisburg-Carlisle | In La Crosse-Onalaska | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,512 | $-3,488 |
| $75,000 | $69,769 | $-5,231 |
| $100,000 | $93,025 | $-6,975 |
| $150,000 | $139,537 | $-10,463 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.7 → 91.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN is 7% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.9-point overall gap.
Rents leads the difference, with La Crosse-Onalaska 26.9 points lower than Harrisburg-Carlisle. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Harrisburg-Carlisle corresponds to $93,025 in La Crosse-Onalaska.
Diff -6.9 RPP
Diff -6.9 RPP
Diff -18.5 RPP
Diff -26.9 RPP
| Category | Harrisburg-Carlisle | La Crosse-Onalaska | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.7 | 91.8 | -6.9 |
| Goods | 100.7 | 93.8 | -6.9 |
| Services | 108.1 | 89.5 | -18.5 |
| Rents | 96.3 | 69.4 | -26.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Harrisburg-Carlisle and La Crosse-Onalaska share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 5.6 to 6.9 RPP points. Harrisburg-Carlisle remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 19.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (7.4 to 26.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Harrisburg-Carlisle RPP | La Crosse-Onalaska RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.0 | 93.3 | 5.6 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2012 | 97.0 | 93.2 | 3.8 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2016 | 98.2 | 92.8 | 5.4 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2020 | 96.1 | 89.5 | 6.6 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2024 | 98.7 | 91.8 | 6.9 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
La Crosse-Onalaska is 7% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle. The overall cost index is 91.8 vs 98.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle has the same purchasing power as $93,025 in La Crosse-Onalaska. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Harrisburg-Carlisle are indexed at 96.3 while La Crosse-Onalaska is at 69.4 (national average = 100). Harrisburg-Carlisle has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.