PlainCost
Home / Compare /

Gulfport-Biloxi vs Rome

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rome is 0.2% more expensive than Gulfport-Biloxi.

0.2% more expensive

Rome, GA is 0.2% more expensive than Gulfport-Biloxi, MS on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.2 vs 90.0). A $100,000 salary in Gulfport-Biloxi buys about the same as $100,172 in Rome; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 90.0 (Gulfport-Biloxi) vs 90.2 (Rome)
  • $100k in Gulfport-Biloxi ≈ $100,172 purchasing power in Rome
  • Services drives the gap (+14.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MS:GA 90.0→90.2

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MS × GA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Gulfport-Biloxi
90.0
Cost Index
Rome
90.2
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Gulfport-Biloxi, MS and Rome, GA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Rome is 14.4 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Gulfport-Biloxi to $100,172 in Rome, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Gulfport-Biloxi
90.0
Rome
90.2
Goods
Gulfport-Biloxi
96.2
Rome
96.3
Services
Gulfport-Biloxi
76.3
Rome
90.7
Rents
Gulfport-Biloxi
67.9
Rome
60.3

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Gulfport-Biloxi would need to be in Rome for the same purchasing power:

In Gulfport-Biloxi In Rome Difference
$50,000 $50,086 +$86
$75,000 $75,129 +$129
$100,000 $100,172 +$172
$150,000 $150,258 +$258
$ in Gulfport-Biloxi = – in Rome

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.0 → 90.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Reverse: Rome → Gulfport-Biloxi Gulfport-Biloxi Details Rome Details

Also Compare

vs Beaumont-Port Arthur vs El Paso vs Manhattan vs Dalton vs Victoria vs Bowling Green vs Las Cruces vs Lawrence

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rome more expensive than Gulfport-Biloxi?

Rome is 0.2% more expensive than Gulfport-Biloxi. The overall cost index is 90.2 vs 90.0 (national average = 100).

What salary in Rome equals $100K in Gulfport-Biloxi?

A $100,000 salary in Gulfport-Biloxi has the same purchasing power as $100,172 in Rome. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Gulfport-Biloxi and Rome?

Rents in Gulfport-Biloxi are indexed at 67.9 while Rome is at 60.3 (national average = 100). Gulfport-Biloxi has higher rents.

Data sources

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.