Overall
- Gulfport-Biloxi
- 90.0
- Las Cruces
- 90.2
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Las Cruces is 0.2% more expensive than Gulfport-Biloxi.
Las Cruces, NM is 0.2% more expensive than Gulfport-Biloxi, MS on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.2 vs 90.0). A $100,000 salary in Gulfport-Biloxi buys about the same as $100,229 in Las Cruces; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair MS:NM 90.0→90.2
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Gulfport-Biloxi, MS and Las Cruces, NM are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Las Cruces is 4.9 points lower. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Gulfport-Biloxi corresponds to $100,229 in Las Cruces.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff +1.6 RPP
Diff -4.9 RPP
| Category | Gulfport-Biloxi | Las Cruces | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.0 | 90.2 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 96.1 | -0.1 |
| Services | 76.3 | 77.9 | +1.6 |
| Rents | 67.9 | 63.0 | -4.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Gulfport-Biloxi would need to be in Las Cruces for the same purchasing power:
| In Gulfport-Biloxi | In Las Cruces | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,114 | +$114 |
| $75,000 | $75,172 | +$172 |
| $100,000 | $100,229 | +$229 |
| $150,000 | $150,343 | +$343 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.0 → 90.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Las Cruces is 0.2% more expensive than Gulfport-Biloxi. The overall cost index is 90.2 vs 90.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Gulfport-Biloxi has the same purchasing power as $100,229 in Las Cruces. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Gulfport-Biloxi are indexed at 67.9 while Las Cruces is at 63.0 (national average = 100). Gulfport-Biloxi has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.