Overall
Diff -0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Flint is 0.1% less expensive than Green Bay.
Flint, MI is 0.1% less expensive than Green Bay, WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 93.0 vs 93.1). A $100,000 salary in Green Bay buys about the same as $99,944 in Flint; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair WI:MI 93.1→93.0
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Green Bay, WI and Flint, MI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Flint is 7.0 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Green Bay to $99,944 in Flint, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff +7.0 RPP
Diff -0.7 RPP
| Category | Green Bay | Flint | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 93.1 | 93.0 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 93.7 | -0.1 |
| Services | 90.0 | 97.1 | +7.0 |
| Rents | 74.7 | 74.0 | -0.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Green Bay and Flint share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.4 to 0.1 RPP points. Green Bay remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 7.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (0.4 to 7.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Green Bay RPP | Flint RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.6 | 96.0 | 1.4 points Flint higher |
| 2012 | 92.9 | 93.0 | 0.1 points Flint higher |
| 2016 | 92.0 | 90.8 | 1.3 points Green Bay higher |
| 2020 | 92.1 | 89.8 | 2.2 points Green Bay higher |
| 2024 | 93.1 | 93.0 | 0.1 points Green Bay higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Green Bay would need to be in Flint for the same purchasing power:
| In Green Bay | In Flint | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,972 | $-28 |
| $75,000 | $74,958 | $-42 |
| $100,000 | $99,944 | $-56 |
| $150,000 | $149,916 | $-84 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.1 → 93.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Flint is 0.1% less expensive than Green Bay. The overall cost index is 93.0 vs 93.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Green Bay has the same purchasing power as $99,944 in Flint. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Green Bay are indexed at 74.7 while Flint is at 74.0 (national average = 100). Green Bay has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.