Overall
- Lancaster
- 98.3
Diff +2.7 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 2.8% more expensive than Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood.
Lancaster, PA is 2.8% more expensive than Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 95.5). A $100,000 salary in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood buys about the same as $102,837 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MI:PA 95.5→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Lancaster, PA is 2.8% more expensive than Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.7-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Lancaster 13.5 points higher than Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood to $102,837 in Lancaster, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +2.7 RPP
Diff +7.0 RPP
Diff +13.5 RPP
Diff +7.2 RPP
| Category | Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.5 | 98.3 | +2.7 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 100.7 | +7.0 |
| Services | 93.8 | 107.3 | +13.5 |
| Rents | 86.6 | 93.8 | +7.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,419 | +$1,419 |
| $75,000 | $77,128 | +$2,128 |
| $100,000 | $102,837 | +$2,837 |
| $150,000 | $154,256 | +$4,256 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.5 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lancaster is 2.8% more expensive than Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 95.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood has the same purchasing power as $102,837 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood are indexed at 86.6 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.