Overall
- Grand Forks
- 86.7
- Parkersburg-Vienna
- 87.1
Diff +0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Parkersburg-Vienna is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Forks.
Parkersburg-Vienna, WV is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Forks, ND-MN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.1 vs 86.7). A $100,000 salary in Grand Forks buys about the same as $100,465 in Parkersburg-Vienna; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair ND:WV 86.7→87.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Grand Forks, ND-MN and Parkersburg-Vienna, WV are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Parkersburg-Vienna is 15.8 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Grand Forks to $100,465 in Parkersburg-Vienna, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff +0.6 RPP
Diff +15.8 RPP
Diff -13.8 RPP
| Category | Grand Forks | Parkersburg-Vienna | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 86.7 | 87.1 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 95.6 | 96.3 | +0.6 |
| Services | 77.1 | 92.9 | +15.8 |
| Rents | 59.7 | 45.9 | -13.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Grand Forks and Parkersburg-Vienna share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 8.6 to 0.4 RPP points. Parkersburg-Vienna remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 22.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (6.5 to 15.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Grand Forks RPP | Parkersburg-Vienna RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.6 | 87.0 | 8.6 points Grand Forks higher |
| 2012 | 89.7 | 91.6 | 1.9 points Parkersburg-Vienna higher |
| 2016 | 92.2 | 92.7 | 0.5 points Parkersburg-Vienna higher |
| 2020 | 91.2 | 86.2 | 5.1 points Grand Forks higher |
| 2024 | 86.7 | 87.1 | 0.4 points Parkersburg-Vienna higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Grand Forks would need to be in Parkersburg-Vienna for the same purchasing power:
| In Grand Forks | In Parkersburg-Vienna | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,233 | +$233 |
| $75,000 | $75,349 | +$349 |
| $100,000 | $100,465 | +$465 |
| $150,000 | $150,698 | +$698 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (86.7 → 87.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Parkersburg-Vienna is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Forks. The overall cost index is 87.1 vs 86.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Grand Forks has the same purchasing power as $100,465 in Parkersburg-Vienna. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Grand Forks are indexed at 59.7 while Parkersburg-Vienna is at 45.9 (national average = 100). Grand Forks has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.