Overall
Diff +0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Pocatello is 0.5% more expensive than Goldsboro.
Pocatello, ID is 0.5% more expensive than Goldsboro, NC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.9 vs 88.5). A $100,000 salary in Goldsboro buys about the same as $100,502 in Pocatello; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair NC:ID 88.5→88.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Goldsboro, NC and Pocatello, ID are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Pocatello is 18.1 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Goldsboro to $100,502 in Pocatello, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff -0.4 RPP
Diff -18.1 RPP
Diff +8.7 RPP
| Category | Goldsboro | Pocatello | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.5 | 88.9 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 96.6 | 96.2 | -0.4 |
| Services | 87.9 | 69.8 | -18.1 |
| Rents | 57.7 | 66.4 | +8.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Goldsboro and Pocatello share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.5 to 0.4 RPP points. Pocatello remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (5.2 to 0.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Goldsboro RPP | Pocatello RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 90.6 | 94.1 | 3.5 points Pocatello higher |
| 2012 | 90.0 | 91.0 | 1.1 points Pocatello higher |
| 2016 | 94.1 | 89.0 | 5.2 points Goldsboro higher |
| 2020 | 85.4 | 89.0 | 3.5 points Pocatello higher |
| 2024 | 88.5 | 88.9 | 0.4 points Pocatello higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Goldsboro would need to be in Pocatello for the same purchasing power:
| In Goldsboro | In Pocatello | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,251 | +$251 |
| $75,000 | $75,376 | +$376 |
| $100,000 | $100,502 | +$502 |
| $150,000 | $150,753 | +$753 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (88.5 → 88.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Pocatello is 0.5% more expensive than Goldsboro. The overall cost index is 88.9 vs 88.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Goldsboro has the same purchasing power as $100,502 in Pocatello. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Goldsboro are indexed at 57.7 while Pocatello is at 66.4 (national average = 100). Pocatello has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.