Overall
Diff +0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Ames is 0.4% more expensive than Goldsboro.
Ames, IA is 0.4% more expensive than Goldsboro, NC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.8 vs 88.5). A $100,000 salary in Goldsboro buys about the same as $100,416 in Ames; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NC:IA 88.5→88.8
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Goldsboro, NC and Ames, IA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Ames is 11.5 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Goldsboro corresponds to $100,416 in Ames.
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff -2.9 RPP
Diff -4.9 RPP
Diff +11.5 RPP
| Category | Goldsboro | Ames | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.5 | 88.8 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 96.6 | 93.7 | -2.9 |
| Services | 87.9 | 83.0 | -4.9 |
| Rents | 57.7 | 69.2 | +11.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Goldsboro and Ames share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 8.1 to 0.4 RPP points. Ames remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 17.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (20.4 to 2.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Goldsboro RPP | Ames RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 90.6 | 82.4 | 8.1 points Goldsboro higher |
| 2012 | 90.0 | 92.3 | 2.4 points Ames higher |
| 2016 | 94.1 | 88.7 | 5.4 points Goldsboro higher |
| 2020 | 85.4 | 93.1 | 7.7 points Ames higher |
| 2024 | 88.5 | 88.8 | 0.4 points Ames higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Goldsboro would need to be in Ames for the same purchasing power:
| In Goldsboro | In Ames | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,208 | +$208 |
| $75,000 | $75,312 | +$312 |
| $100,000 | $100,416 | +$416 |
| $150,000 | $150,624 | +$624 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (88.5 → 88.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Ames is 0.4% more expensive than Goldsboro. The overall cost index is 88.8 vs 88.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Goldsboro has the same purchasing power as $100,416 in Ames. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Goldsboro are indexed at 57.7 while Ames is at 69.2 (national average = 100). Ames has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.