Overall
- Glens Falls
- 94.9
- Sheboygan
- 94.0
Diff -0.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Sheboygan is 0.9% less expensive than Glens Falls.
Sheboygan, WI is 0.9% less expensive than Glens Falls, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.0 vs 94.9). A $100,000 salary in Glens Falls buys about the same as $99,102 in Sheboygan; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:WI 94.9→94.0
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Glens Falls, NY and Sheboygan, WI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.9 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Sheboygan is 46.3 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Glens Falls to $99,102 in Sheboygan, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.9 RPP
Diff -5.9 RPP
Diff -46.3 RPP
Diff +4.3 RPP
| Category | Glens Falls | Sheboygan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 94.9 | 94.0 | -0.9 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 93.8 | -5.9 |
| Services | 133.8 | 87.6 | -46.3 |
| Rents | 76.2 | 80.5 | +4.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Glens Falls and Sheboygan share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 2.7 to 0.9 RPP points. Glens Falls remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 10.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (5.7 to 4.3 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Glens Falls RPP | Sheboygan RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 98.5 | 95.7 | 2.7 points Glens Falls higher |
| 2012 | 97.3 | 93.0 | 4.3 points Glens Falls higher |
| 2016 | 97.0 | 93.3 | 3.6 points Glens Falls higher |
| 2020 | 95.0 | 93.3 | 1.7 points Glens Falls higher |
| 2024 | 94.9 | 94.0 | 0.9 points Glens Falls higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Glens Falls would need to be in Sheboygan for the same purchasing power:
| In Glens Falls | In Sheboygan | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,551 | $-449 |
| $75,000 | $74,326 | $-674 |
| $100,000 | $99,102 | $-898 |
| $150,000 | $148,653 | $-1,347 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.9 → 94.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Sheboygan is 0.9% less expensive than Glens Falls. The overall cost index is 94.0 vs 94.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Glens Falls has the same purchasing power as $99,102 in Sheboygan. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Glens Falls are indexed at 76.2 while Sheboygan is at 80.5 (national average = 100). Sheboygan has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.