Glens Falls vs Lewiston-Auburn

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lewiston-Auburn is 0.1% less expensive than Glens Falls.

0.1% less expensive

Lewiston-Auburn, ME is 0.1% less expensive than Glens Falls, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.7 vs 94.9). A $100,000 salary in Glens Falls buys about the same as $99,863 in Lewiston-Auburn; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 94.9 (Glens Falls) vs 94.7 (Lewiston-Auburn)
  • $100k in Glens Falls ≈ $99,863 purchasing power in Lewiston-Auburn
  • Rents drives the gap (-7.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair NY:ME 94.9→94.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE NY × ME
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Glens Falls
94.9
Cost Index
Lewiston-Auburn
94.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Glens Falls, NY and Lewiston-Auburn, ME are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Lewiston-Auburn is 7.2 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Glens Falls corresponds to $99,863 in Lewiston-Auburn.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Glens Falls
94.9
Lewiston-Auburn
94.7
Goods
Glens Falls
99.7
Lewiston-Auburn
97.2
Services
Glens Falls
133.8
Lewiston-Auburn
134.4
Rents
Glens Falls
76.2
Lewiston-Auburn
69.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Glens Falls would need to be in Lewiston-Auburn for the same purchasing power:

In Glens Falls In Lewiston-Auburn Difference
$50,000 $49,931 $-69
$75,000 $74,897 $-103
$100,000 $99,863 $-137
$150,000 $149,794 $-206
$ in Glens Falls = in Lewiston-Auburn

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.9 → 94.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lewiston-Auburn more expensive than Glens Falls?

Lewiston-Auburn is 0.1% less expensive than Glens Falls. The overall cost index is 94.7 vs 94.9 (national average = 100).

What salary in Lewiston-Auburn equals $100K in Glens Falls?

A $100,000 salary in Glens Falls has the same purchasing power as $99,863 in Lewiston-Auburn. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Glens Falls and Lewiston-Auburn?

Rents in Glens Falls are indexed at 76.2 while Lewiston-Auburn is at 69.0 (national average = 100). Glens Falls has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.