Glens Falls vs Merced

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Merced is 3.6% more expensive than Glens Falls.

3.6% more expensive

Merced, CA is 3.6% more expensive than Glens Falls, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 94.9). A $100,000 salary in Glens Falls buys about the same as $103,593 in Merced; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 94.9 (Glens Falls) vs 98.3 (Merced)
  • $100k in Glens Falls ≈ $103,593 purchasing power in Merced
  • Services drives the gap (+24.5 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair NY:CA 94.9→98.3

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE NY × CA
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Merced, CA is 3.6% more expensive than Glens Falls, NY, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.4-point overall gap.

Services leads the difference, with Merced 24.5 points higher than Glens Falls. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Glens Falls to $103,593 in Merced, but it is not a personal spending weight.

How the Price Gap Changed

Glens Falls and Merced share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.2 to 3.4 RPP points. Merced remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 68.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (43.7 to 24.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Glens Falls RPP Merced RPP Relative Gap
2008 98.5 94.3 4.2 points Glens Falls higher
2012 97.3 98.6 1.2 points Merced higher
2016 97.0 95.3 1.6 points Glens Falls higher
2020 95.0 98.7 3.8 points Merced higher
2024 94.9 98.3 3.4 points Merced higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Glens Falls
94.9
Merced
98.3
Goods
Glens Falls
99.7
Merced
105.2
Services
Glens Falls
133.8
Merced
158.3
Rents
Glens Falls
76.2
Merced
78.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Glens Falls would need to be in Merced for the same purchasing power:

In Glens Falls In Merced Difference
$50,000 $51,797 +$1,797
$75,000 $77,695 +$2,695
$100,000 $103,593 +$3,593
$150,000 $155,390 +$5,390
$ in Glens Falls = in Merced

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.9 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Glens Falls
94.9
Cost Index
Merced
98.3
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Merced more expensive than Glens Falls?

Merced is 3.6% more expensive than Glens Falls. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 94.9 (national average = 100).

What salary in Merced equals $100K in Glens Falls?

A $100,000 salary in Glens Falls has the same purchasing power as $103,593 in Merced. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Glens Falls and Merced?

Rents in Glens Falls are indexed at 76.2 while Merced is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Merced has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.