Fresno vs Chicago-Naperville-Elgin

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 1.4% more expensive than Fresno.

1.4% more expensive

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN is 1.4% more expensive than Fresno, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.6 vs 102.2). A $100,000 salary in Fresno buys about the same as $101,407 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 102.2 (Fresno) vs 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin)
  • $100k in Fresno ≈ $101,407 purchasing power in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
  • Services drives the gap (-77.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair CA:IL 102.2→103.6

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE CA × IL
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Fresno
102.2
Cost Index
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Fresno, CA and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 77.4 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Fresno to $101,407 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Fresno
102.2
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Goods
Fresno
105.2
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
Services
Fresno
161.0
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
Rents
Fresno
95.7
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Fresno would need to be in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin for the same purchasing power:

In Fresno In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin Difference
$50,000 $50,703 +$703
$75,000 $76,055 +$1,055
$100,000 $101,407 +$1,407
$150,000 $152,110 +$2,110
$ in Fresno = in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (102.2 → 103.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Chicago-Naperville-Elgin more expensive than Fresno?

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 1.4% more expensive than Fresno. The overall cost index is 103.6 vs 102.2 (national average = 100).

What salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin equals $100K in Fresno?

A $100,000 salary in Fresno has the same purchasing power as $101,407 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Fresno and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

Rents in Fresno are indexed at 95.7 while Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is at 112.0 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.