Overall
Diff -0.3 RPP
Flint vs Yuma
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yuma is 0.4% less expensive than Flint.
0.4% less expensive
Yuma, AZ is 0.4% less expensive than Flint, MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 93.0). A $100,000 salary in Flint buys about the same as $99,647 in Yuma; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 93.0 (Flint) vs 92.7 (Yuma)
- $100k in Flint ≈ $99,647 purchasing power in Yuma
- Services drives the gap (-9.2 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair MI:AZ 93.0→92.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE MI × AZ
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Flint
93.0
Cost Index
Yuma
92.7
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Flint, MI and Yuma, AZ are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Yuma is 9.2 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Flint to $99,647 in Yuma, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +2.5 RPP
Services
Diff -9.2 RPP
Rents
Diff -0.3 RPP
| Category | Flint | Yuma | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 93.0 | 92.7 | -0.3 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 96.2 | +2.5 |
| Services | 97.1 | 87.8 | -9.2 |
| Rents | 74.0 | 73.8 | -0.3 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Flint 93.0
Yuma 92.7
Goods
Flint 93.7
Yuma 96.2
Services
Flint 97.1
Yuma 87.8
Rents
Flint 74.0
Yuma 73.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Flint would need to be in Yuma for the same purchasing power:
| In Flint | In Yuma | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,824 | $-176 |
| $75,000 | $74,736 | $-264 |
| $100,000 | $99,647 | $-353 |
| $150,000 | $149,471 | $-529 |
$ in Flint = in Yuma
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.0 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Yuma more expensive than Flint?
Yuma is 0.4% less expensive than Flint. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 93.0 (national average = 100).
What salary in Yuma equals $100K in Flint?
A $100,000 salary in Flint has the same purchasing power as $99,647 in Yuma. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Flint and Yuma?
Rents in Flint are indexed at 74.0 while Yuma is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Flint has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.