Flint vs Yuma

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yuma is 0.4% less expensive than Flint.

0.4% less expensive

Yuma, AZ is 0.4% less expensive than Flint, MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 93.0). A $100,000 salary in Flint buys about the same as $99,647 in Yuma; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 93.0 (Flint) vs 92.7 (Yuma)
  • $100k in Flint ≈ $99,647 purchasing power in Yuma
  • Services drives the gap (-9.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MI:AZ 93.0→92.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MI × AZ
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Flint
93.0
Cost Index
Yuma
92.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Flint, MI and Yuma, AZ are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Yuma is 9.2 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Flint to $99,647 in Yuma, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Services

Flint
97.1
Yuma
87.8

Diff -9.2 RPP

Visual Comparison

Overall
Flint
93.0
Yuma
92.7
Goods
Flint
93.7
Yuma
96.2
Services
Flint
97.1
Yuma
87.8
Rents
Flint
74.0
Yuma
73.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

How the Price Gap Changed

Flint and Yuma share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.6 to 0.3 RPP points. Flint remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 7.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (4.5 to 2.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Flint RPP Yuma RPP Relative Gap
2008 96.0 92.4 3.6 points Flint higher
2012 93.0 93.8 0.8 points Yuma higher
2016 90.8 92.7 1.9 points Yuma higher
2020 89.8 88.7 1.2 points Flint higher
2024 93.0 92.7 0.3 points Flint higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Flint would need to be in Yuma for the same purchasing power:

In Flint In Yuma Difference
$50,000 $49,824 $-176
$75,000 $74,736 $-264
$100,000 $99,647 $-353
$150,000 $149,471 $-529
$ in Flint = – in Yuma

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.0 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yuma more expensive than Flint?

Yuma is 0.4% less expensive than Flint. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 93.0 (national average = 100).

What salary in Yuma equals $100K in Flint?

A $100,000 salary in Flint has the same purchasing power as $99,647 in Yuma. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Flint and Yuma?

Rents in Flint are indexed at 74.0 while Yuma is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Flint has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.