Overall
- Flint
- 93.0
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 92.9
Diff -0.1 RPP
Flint vs Oshkosh-Neenah
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Oshkosh-Neenah is 0.1% less expensive than Flint.
0.1% less expensive
Oshkosh-Neenah, WI is 0.1% less expensive than Flint, MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.9 vs 93.0). A $100,000 salary in Flint buys about the same as $99,887 in Oshkosh-Neenah; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 93.0 (Flint) vs 92.9 (Oshkosh-Neenah)
- $100k in Flint ≈ $99,887 purchasing power in Oshkosh-Neenah
- Services drives the gap (-6.5 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair MI:WI 93.0→92.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE MI × WI
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Flint
93.0
Cost Index
Oshkosh-Neenah
92.9
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Flint, MI and Oshkosh-Neenah, WI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Oshkosh-Neenah is 6.5 points lower. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Flint to $99,887 in Oshkosh-Neenah, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Flint
- 93.7
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 93.8
Diff +0.1 RPP
Services
- Flint
- 97.1
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 90.6
Diff -6.5 RPP
Rents
- Flint
- 74.0
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 74.4
Diff +0.4 RPP
| Category | Flint | Oshkosh-Neenah | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 93.0 | 92.9 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 93.8 | +0.1 |
| Services | 97.1 | 90.6 | -6.5 |
| Rents | 74.0 | 74.4 | +0.4 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Flint 93.0
Oshkosh-Neenah 92.9
Goods
Flint 93.7
Oshkosh-Neenah 93.8
Services
Flint 97.1
Oshkosh-Neenah 90.6
Rents
Flint 74.0
Oshkosh-Neenah 74.4
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Flint would need to be in Oshkosh-Neenah for the same purchasing power:
| In Flint | In Oshkosh-Neenah | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,944 | $-56 |
| $75,000 | $74,915 | $-85 |
| $100,000 | $99,887 | $-113 |
| $150,000 | $149,831 | $-169 |
$ in Flint = in Oshkosh-Neenah
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.0 → 92.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Oshkosh-Neenah more expensive than Flint?
Oshkosh-Neenah is 0.1% less expensive than Flint. The overall cost index is 92.9 vs 93.0 (national average = 100).
What salary in Oshkosh-Neenah equals $100K in Flint?
A $100,000 salary in Flint has the same purchasing power as $99,887 in Oshkosh-Neenah. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Flint and Oshkosh-Neenah?
Rents in Flint are indexed at 74.0 while Oshkosh-Neenah is at 74.4 (national average = 100). Oshkosh-Neenah has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.