Flint vs Binghamton

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Binghamton is 0.2% less expensive than Flint.

0.2% less expensive

Binghamton, NY is 0.2% less expensive than Flint, MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.9 vs 93.0). A $100,000 salary in Flint buys about the same as $99,816 in Binghamton; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 93.0 (Flint) vs 92.9 (Binghamton)
  • $100k in Flint ≈ $99,816 purchasing power in Binghamton
  • Services drives the gap (+34.5 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MI:NY 93.0→92.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MI × NY
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Flint
93.0
Cost Index
Binghamton
92.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Flint, MI and Binghamton, NY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Binghamton is 34.5 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Flint to $99,816 in Binghamton, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Flint
93.0
Binghamton
92.9
Goods
Flint
93.7
Binghamton
99.7
Services
Flint
97.1
Binghamton
131.6
Rents
Flint
74.0
Binghamton
69.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Flint would need to be in Binghamton for the same purchasing power:

In Flint In Binghamton Difference
$50,000 $49,908 $-92
$75,000 $74,862 $-138
$100,000 $99,816 $-184
$150,000 $149,724 $-276
$ in Flint = in Binghamton

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.0 → 92.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Binghamton more expensive than Flint?

Binghamton is 0.2% less expensive than Flint. The overall cost index is 92.9 vs 93.0 (national average = 100).

What salary in Binghamton equals $100K in Flint?

A $100,000 salary in Flint has the same purchasing power as $99,816 in Binghamton. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Flint and Binghamton?

Rents in Flint are indexed at 74.0 while Binghamton is at 69.7 (national average = 100). Flint has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.