Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers vs Bismarck

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Bismarck is 0.4% less expensive than Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers.

0.4% less expensive

Bismarck, ND is 0.4% less expensive than Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.0 vs 91.4). A $100,000 salary in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers buys about the same as $99,640 in Bismarck; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 91.4 (Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers) vs 91.0 (Bismarck)
  • $100k in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers ≈ $99,640 purchasing power in Bismarck
  • Rents drives the gap (+7.1 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AR:ND 91.4→91.0

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE AR × ND
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
91.4
Cost Index
Bismarck
91.0
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR and Bismarck, ND are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Bismarck is 7.1 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers corresponds to $99,640 in Bismarck.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
91.4
Bismarck
91.0
Goods
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
93.6
Bismarck
95.7
Services
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
75.1
Bismarck
75.0
Rents
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
76.9
Bismarck
84.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers would need to be in Bismarck for the same purchasing power:

In Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers In Bismarck Difference
$50,000 $49,820 $-180
$75,000 $74,730 $-270
$100,000 $99,640 $-360
$150,000 $149,460 $-540
$ in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers = in Bismarck

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.4 → 91.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bismarck more expensive than Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers?

Bismarck is 0.4% less expensive than Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers. The overall cost index is 91.0 vs 91.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Bismarck equals $100K in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers?

A $100,000 salary in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers has the same purchasing power as $99,640 in Bismarck. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers and Bismarck?

Rents in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers are indexed at 76.9 while Bismarck is at 84.0 (national average = 100). Bismarck has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.