Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers vs Chattanooga

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Chattanooga is 0.1% more expensive than Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers.

0.1% more expensive

Chattanooga, TN-GA is 0.1% more expensive than Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.5 vs 91.4). A $100,000 salary in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers buys about the same as $100,122 in Chattanooga; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 91.4 (Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers) vs 91.5 (Chattanooga)
  • $100k in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers ≈ $100,122 purchasing power in Chattanooga
  • Goods drives the gap (+2.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AR:TN 91.4→91.5

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE AR × TN
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
91.4
Cost Index
Chattanooga
91.5
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR and Chattanooga, TN-GA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Goods creates the largest separation: Chattanooga is 2.4 points higher. But services and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $100,122 in Chattanooga as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, then replace the national basket with your own.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
91.4
Chattanooga
91.5
Goods
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
93.6
Chattanooga
96.0
Services
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
75.1
Chattanooga
74.2
Rents
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
76.9
Chattanooga
76.5

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers would need to be in Chattanooga for the same purchasing power:

In Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers In Chattanooga Difference
$50,000 $50,061 +$61
$75,000 $75,091 +$91
$100,000 $100,122 +$122
$150,000 $150,182 +$182
$ in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers = in Chattanooga

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.4 → 91.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Chattanooga more expensive than Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers?

Chattanooga is 0.1% more expensive than Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers. The overall cost index is 91.5 vs 91.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Chattanooga equals $100K in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers?

A $100,000 salary in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers has the same purchasing power as $100,122 in Chattanooga. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers and Chattanooga?

Rents in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers are indexed at 76.9 while Chattanooga is at 76.5 (national average = 100). Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.