Overall
- Farmington
- 87.7
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff +16.0 RPP
Farmington vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 18.2% more expensive than Farmington.
18.2% more expensive
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 18.2% more expensive than Farmington, NM on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 87.7). A $100,000 salary in Farmington buys about the same as $118,200 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 87.7 (Farmington) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
- $100k in Farmington ≈ $118,200 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- Rents drives the gap (+60.1 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair NM:WA 87.7→103.7
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-STEEP
- TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
- CROSS-STATE NM × WA
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-STEEP Steep PP convert
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Farmington would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:
| In Farmington | In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $59,100 | +$9,100 |
| $75,000 | $88,650 | +$13,650 |
| $100,000 | $118,200 | +$18,200 |
| $150,000 | $177,301 | +$27,301 |
$ in Farmington = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.7 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Farmington, NM and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 16.0 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Farmington is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 60.1 points higher than Farmington. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Farmington corresponds to $118,200 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Farmington
- 96.1
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 105.0
Diff +8.9 RPP
Services
- Farmington
- 77.9
Diff +13.8 RPP
Rents
- Farmington
- 56.6
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 116.7
Diff +60.1 RPP
| Category | Farmington | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.7 | 103.7 | +16.0 |
| Goods | 96.1 | 105.0 | +8.9 |
| Services | 77.9 | 91.7 | +13.8 |
| Rents | 56.6 | 116.7 | +60.1 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Farmington 87.7
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 103.7
Goods
Farmington 96.1
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 105.0
Services
Farmington 77.9
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 91.7
Rents
Farmington 56.6
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 116.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
Farmington
87.7
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Farmington?
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 18.2% more expensive than Farmington. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 87.7 (national average = 100).
What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Farmington?
A $100,000 salary in Farmington has the same purchasing power as $118,200 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Farmington and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
Rents in Farmington are indexed at 56.6 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.