Overall
- Farmington
- 87.7
- Hattiesburg
- 87.6
Diff -0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Hattiesburg is 0.1% less expensive than Farmington.
Hattiesburg, MS is 0.1% less expensive than Farmington, NM on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.6 vs 87.7). A $100,000 salary in Farmington buys about the same as $99,916 in Hattiesburg; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NM:MS 87.7→87.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Farmington, NM and Hattiesburg, MS are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Hattiesburg is 3.5 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Farmington corresponds to $99,916 in Hattiesburg.
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff -1.0 RPP
Diff +3.5 RPP
| Category | Farmington | Hattiesburg | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.7 | 87.6 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 96.1 | 96.2 | +0.1 |
| Services | 77.9 | 76.9 | -1.0 |
| Rents | 56.6 | 60.1 | +3.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Farmington and Hattiesburg share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.1 to 0.1 RPP points. Farmington remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 6.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (6.6 to 0.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Farmington RPP | Hattiesburg RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.0 | 89.9 | 5.1 points Farmington higher |
| 2012 | 94.8 | 89.6 | 5.2 points Farmington higher |
| 2016 | 95.0 | 88.5 | 6.5 points Farmington higher |
| 2020 | 89.1 | 85.3 | 3.8 points Farmington higher |
| 2024 | 87.7 | 87.6 | 0.1 points Farmington higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Farmington would need to be in Hattiesburg for the same purchasing power:
| In Farmington | In Hattiesburg | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,958 | $-42 |
| $75,000 | $74,937 | $-63 |
| $100,000 | $99,916 | $-84 |
| $150,000 | $149,873 | $-127 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.7 → 87.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Hattiesburg is 0.1% less expensive than Farmington. The overall cost index is 87.6 vs 87.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Farmington has the same purchasing power as $99,916 in Hattiesburg. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Farmington are indexed at 56.6 while Hattiesburg is at 60.1 (national average = 100). Hattiesburg has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.