Overall
- Fairbanks-College
- 103.2
- Utica-Rome
- 92.7
Diff -10.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Utica-Rome is 10.2% less expensive than Fairbanks-College.
Utica-Rome, NY is 10.2% less expensive than Fairbanks-College, AK on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 103.2). A $100,000 salary in Fairbanks-College buys about the same as $89,797 in Utica-Rome; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair AK:NY 103.2→92.7
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -10.5 RPP
Diff -7.6 RPP
Diff +12.1 RPP
Diff -26.5 RPP
| Category | Fairbanks-College | Utica-Rome | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.2 | 92.7 | -10.5 |
| Goods | 107.3 | 99.7 | -7.6 |
| Services | 119.8 | 131.9 | +12.1 |
| Rents | 92.6 | 66.1 | -26.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Utica-Rome is 26.5 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Fairbanks-College, AK and Utica-Rome, NY sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 10.5 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Fairbanks-College is above 100 while Utica-Rome is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Fairbanks-College corresponds to $89,797 in Utica-Rome.
What a salary in Fairbanks-College would need to be in Utica-Rome for the same purchasing power:
| In Fairbanks-College | In Utica-Rome | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $44,899 | $-5,101 |
| $75,000 | $67,348 | $-7,652 |
| $100,000 | $89,797 | $-10,203 |
| $150,000 | $134,696 | $-15,304 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.2 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Fairbanks-College and Utica-Rome share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 9.0 to 10.5 RPP points. Fairbanks-College remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 33.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (45.3 to 12.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Fairbanks-College RPP | Utica-Rome RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 104.7 | 95.7 | 9.0 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2012 | 97.9 | 93.5 | 4.4 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2016 | 100.4 | 95.3 | 5.1 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2020 | 99.4 | 93.4 | 6.0 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2024 | 103.2 | 92.7 | 10.5 points Fairbanks-College higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Utica-Rome is 10.2% less expensive than Fairbanks-College. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 103.2 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Fairbanks-College has the same purchasing power as $89,797 in Utica-Rome. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Fairbanks-College are indexed at 92.6 while Utica-Rome is at 66.1 (national average = 100). Fairbanks-College has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.