Overall
- Durham-Chapel Hill
- 97.6
- Richmond
- 97.9
Diff +0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Richmond is 0.3% more expensive than Durham-Chapel Hill.
Richmond, VA is 0.3% more expensive than Durham-Chapel Hill, NC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 97.9 vs 97.6). A $100,000 salary in Durham-Chapel Hill buys about the same as $100,293 in Richmond; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NC:VA 97.6→97.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Durham-Chapel Hill, NC and Richmond, VA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Richmond is 0.2 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Durham-Chapel Hill corresponds to $100,293 in Richmond.
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
| Category | Durham-Chapel Hill | Richmond | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 97.6 | 97.9 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 96.6 | 96.8 | +0.2 |
| Services | 89.3 | 89.2 | -0.1 |
| Rents | 98.9 | 99.1 | +0.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Durham-Chapel Hill would need to be in Richmond for the same purchasing power:
| In Durham-Chapel Hill | In Richmond | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,147 | +$147 |
| $75,000 | $75,220 | +$220 |
| $100,000 | $100,293 | +$293 |
| $150,000 | $150,440 | +$440 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (97.6 → 97.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Richmond is 0.3% more expensive than Durham-Chapel Hill. The overall cost index is 97.9 vs 97.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Durham-Chapel Hill has the same purchasing power as $100,293 in Richmond. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Durham-Chapel Hill are indexed at 98.9 while Richmond is at 99.1 (national average = 100). Richmond has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.