Overall
- Durham-Chapel Hill
- 97.6
- Grants Pass
- 97.8
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Grants Pass is 0.2% more expensive than Durham-Chapel Hill.
Grants Pass, OR is 0.2% more expensive than Durham-Chapel Hill, NC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 97.8 vs 97.6). A $100,000 salary in Durham-Chapel Hill buys about the same as $100,193 in Grants Pass; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NC:OR 97.6→97.8
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Durham-Chapel Hill, NC and Grants Pass, OR are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Grants Pass is 19.0 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Durham-Chapel Hill corresponds to $100,193 in Grants Pass.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff +8.6 RPP
Diff +14.2 RPP
Diff -19.0 RPP
| Category | Durham-Chapel Hill | Grants Pass | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 97.6 | 97.8 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 96.6 | 105.3 | +8.6 |
| Services | 89.3 | 103.6 | +14.2 |
| Rents | 98.9 | 79.9 | -19.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Durham-Chapel Hill and Grants Pass share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.2 to 0.2 RPP points. Grants Pass remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 30.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (15.7 to 14.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Durham-Chapel Hill RPP | Grants Pass RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 97.3 | 96.2 | 1.2 points Durham-Chapel Hill higher |
| 2012 | 96.7 | 96.1 | 0.6 points Durham-Chapel Hill higher |
| 2016 | 97.5 | 96.2 | 1.3 points Durham-Chapel Hill higher |
| 2020 | 94.8 | 95.0 | 0.1 points Grants Pass higher |
| 2024 | 97.6 | 97.8 | 0.2 points Grants Pass higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Durham-Chapel Hill would need to be in Grants Pass for the same purchasing power:
| In Durham-Chapel Hill | In Grants Pass | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,096 | +$96 |
| $75,000 | $75,145 | +$145 |
| $100,000 | $100,193 | +$193 |
| $150,000 | $150,289 | +$289 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (97.6 → 97.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Grants Pass is 0.2% more expensive than Durham-Chapel Hill. The overall cost index is 97.8 vs 97.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Durham-Chapel Hill has the same purchasing power as $100,193 in Grants Pass. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Durham-Chapel Hill are indexed at 98.9 while Grants Pass is at 79.9 (national average = 100). Durham-Chapel Hill has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.