Durham-Chapel Hill vs Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos is 0.5% more expensive than Durham-Chapel Hill.

0.5% more expensive

Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX is 0.5% more expensive than Durham-Chapel Hill, NC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.1 vs 97.6). A $100,000 salary in Durham-Chapel Hill buys about the same as $100,506 in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 97.6 (Durham-Chapel Hill) vs 98.1 (Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos)
  • $100k in Durham-Chapel Hill ≈ $100,506 purchasing power in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos
  • Rents drives the gap (+21.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair NC:TX 97.6→98.1

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE NC × TX
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Durham-Chapel Hill
97.6
Cost Index
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos
98.1
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Durham-Chapel Hill, NC and Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos is 21.4 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Durham-Chapel Hill corresponds to $100,506 in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Durham-Chapel Hill
97.6
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos
98.1
Goods
Durham-Chapel Hill
96.6
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos
93.8
Services
Durham-Chapel Hill
89.3
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos
82.0
Rents
Durham-Chapel Hill
98.9
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos
120.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Durham-Chapel Hill would need to be in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos for the same purchasing power:

In Durham-Chapel Hill In Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos Difference
$50,000 $50,253 +$253
$75,000 $75,380 +$380
$100,000 $100,506 +$506
$150,000 $150,759 +$759
$ in Durham-Chapel Hill = in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (97.6 → 98.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos more expensive than Durham-Chapel Hill?

Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos is 0.5% more expensive than Durham-Chapel Hill. The overall cost index is 98.1 vs 97.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos equals $100K in Durham-Chapel Hill?

A $100,000 salary in Durham-Chapel Hill has the same purchasing power as $100,506 in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Durham-Chapel Hill and Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos?

Rents in Durham-Chapel Hill are indexed at 98.9 while Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos is at 120.4 (national average = 100). Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.