Overall
- Tucson
- 96.9
Diff -6.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Tucson is 6% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington.
Tucson, AZ is 6% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.9 vs 103.1). A $100,000 salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington buys about the same as $93,992 in Tucson; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:AZ 103.1→96.9
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington would need to be in Tucson for the same purchasing power:
| In Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | In Tucson | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,996 | $-3,004 |
| $75,000 | $70,494 | $-4,506 |
| $100,000 | $93,992 | $-6,008 |
| $150,000 | $140,987 | $-9,013 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.1 → 96.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Tucson, AZ is 6% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.2-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is above 100 while Tucson is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Tucson 26.1 points lower than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington corresponds to $93,992 in Tucson.
Diff -6.2 RPP
Diff -6.6 RPP
Diff -1.2 RPP
Diff -26.1 RPP
| Category | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | Tucson | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.1 | 96.9 | -6.2 |
| Goods | 102.8 | 96.2 | -6.6 |
| Services | 90.7 | 89.5 | -1.2 |
| Rents | 117.9 | 91.8 | -26.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington and Tucson share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 4.3 to 6.2 RPP points. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 19.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (6.2 to 26.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington RPP | Tucson RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 101.4 | 97.1 | 4.3 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2012 | 100.8 | 100.6 | 0.2 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2016 | 98.0 | 96.6 | 1.5 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2020 | 104.5 | 94.0 | 10.5 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2024 | 103.1 | 96.9 | 6.2 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Tucson is 6% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. The overall cost index is 96.9 vs 103.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has the same purchasing power as $93,992 in Tucson. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington are indexed at 117.9 while Tucson is at 91.8 (national average = 100). Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.