Overall
- Pittsfield
- 95.1
Diff -8.0 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Pittsfield is 7.7% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington.
Pittsfield, MA is 7.7% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.1 vs 103.1). A $100,000 salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington buys about the same as $92,255 in Pittsfield; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:MA 103.1→95.1
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -8.0 RPP
Diff -5.8 RPP
Diff +63.0 RPP
Diff -44.4 RPP
| Category | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | Pittsfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.1 | 95.1 | -8.0 |
| Goods | 102.8 | 97.0 | -5.8 |
| Services | 90.7 | 153.7 | +63.0 |
| Rents | 117.9 | 73.5 | -44.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Pittsfield is 63.0 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Pittsfield, MA is 7.7% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 8.0-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is above 100 while Pittsfield is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington to $92,255 in Pittsfield, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington would need to be in Pittsfield for the same purchasing power:
| In Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | In Pittsfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,128 | $-3,872 |
| $75,000 | $69,191 | $-5,809 |
| $100,000 | $92,255 | $-7,745 |
| $150,000 | $138,383 | $-11,617 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.1 → 95.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington and Pittsfield share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 1.7 to 8.0 RPP points. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 32.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (30.6 to 63.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington RPP | Pittsfield RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 101.4 | 99.6 | 1.7 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2012 | 100.8 | 97.8 | 3.0 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2016 | 98.0 | 100.5 | 2.4 points Pittsfield higher |
| 2020 | 104.5 | 99.5 | 5.1 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2024 | 103.1 | 95.1 | 8.0 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Pittsfield is 7.7% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. The overall cost index is 95.1 vs 103.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has the same purchasing power as $92,255 in Pittsfield. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington are indexed at 117.9 while Pittsfield is at 73.5 (national average = 100). Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.