Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 0.6% more expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington.

0.6% more expensive

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 0.6% more expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 103.1). A $100,000 salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington buys about the same as $100,563 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 103.1 (Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
  • $100k in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington ≈ $100,563 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
  • Goods drives the gap (+2.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TX:WA 103.1→103.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE TX × WA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Goods creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 2.2 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $100,563 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, then replace the national basket with your own.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Goods
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
102.8
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
105.0
Services
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
90.7
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
91.7
Rents
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
117.9
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
116.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:

In Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater Difference
$50,000 $50,281 +$281
$75,000 $75,422 +$422
$100,000 $100,563 +$563
$150,000 $150,844 +$844
$ in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.1 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington?

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 0.6% more expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 103.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington?

A $100,000 salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has the same purchasing power as $100,563 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

Rents in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington are indexed at 117.9 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.