Overall
- Lewiston-Auburn
- 94.7
Diff -8.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lewiston-Auburn is 8.1% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington.
Lewiston-Auburn, ME is 8.1% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.7 vs 103.1). A $100,000 salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington buys about the same as $91,896 in Lewiston-Auburn; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:ME 103.1→94.7
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -8.4 RPP
Diff -5.7 RPP
Diff +43.7 RPP
Diff -48.9 RPP
| Category | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | Lewiston-Auburn | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.1 | 94.7 | -8.4 |
| Goods | 102.8 | 97.2 | -5.7 |
| Services | 90.7 | 134.4 | +43.7 |
| Rents | 117.9 | 69.0 | -48.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Lewiston-Auburn is 48.9 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX and Lewiston-Auburn, ME sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 8.4 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is above 100 while Lewiston-Auburn is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington corresponds to $91,896 in Lewiston-Auburn.
What a salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington would need to be in Lewiston-Auburn for the same purchasing power:
| In Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | In Lewiston-Auburn | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $45,948 | $-4,052 |
| $75,000 | $68,922 | $-6,078 |
| $100,000 | $91,896 | $-8,104 |
| $150,000 | $137,845 | $-12,155 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.1 → 94.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington and Lewiston-Auburn share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 3.6 to 8.4 RPP points. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 24.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (24.5 to 48.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington RPP | Lewiston-Auburn RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 101.4 | 97.7 | 3.6 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2012 | 100.8 | 98.8 | 2.0 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2016 | 98.0 | 96.6 | 1.5 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2020 | 104.5 | 99.7 | 4.9 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2024 | 103.1 | 94.7 | 8.4 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Lewiston-Auburn is 8.1% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. The overall cost index is 94.7 vs 103.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has the same purchasing power as $91,896 in Lewiston-Auburn. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington are indexed at 117.9 while Lewiston-Auburn is at 69.0 (national average = 100). Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.