Overall
- Clarksville
- 90.9
- Rochester
- 90.8
Diff -0.1 RPP
Clarksville vs Rochester
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rochester is 0.1% less expensive than Clarksville.
0.1% less expensive
Rochester, MN is 0.1% less expensive than Clarksville, TN-KY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.8 vs 90.9). A $100,000 salary in Clarksville buys about the same as $99,861 in Rochester; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 90.9 (Clarksville) vs 90.8 (Rochester)
- $100k in Clarksville ≈ $99,861 purchasing power in Rochester
- Services drives the gap (+14.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair TN:MN 90.9→90.8
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE TN × MN
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Clarksville
90.9
Cost Index
Rochester
90.8
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Clarksville, TN-KY and Rochester, MN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Rochester is 14.8 points higher. But services and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Clarksville to $99,861 in Rochester, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Clarksville
- 96.2
- Rochester
- 95.4
Diff -0.8 RPP
Services
- Clarksville
- 72.5
- Rochester
- 87.4
Diff +14.8 RPP
Rents
- Clarksville
- 73.8
- Rochester
- 78.6
Diff +4.8 RPP
| Category | Clarksville | Rochester | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.9 | 90.8 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 95.4 | -0.8 |
| Services | 72.5 | 87.4 | +14.8 |
| Rents | 73.8 | 78.6 | +4.8 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Clarksville 90.9
Rochester 90.8
Goods
Clarksville 96.2
Rochester 95.4
Services
Clarksville 72.5
Rochester 87.4
Rents
Clarksville 73.8
Rochester 78.6
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Clarksville would need to be in Rochester for the same purchasing power:
| In Clarksville | In Rochester | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,931 | $-69 |
| $75,000 | $74,896 | $-104 |
| $100,000 | $99,861 | $-139 |
| $150,000 | $149,792 | $-208 |
$ in Clarksville = in Rochester
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.9 → 90.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Rochester more expensive than Clarksville?
Rochester is 0.1% less expensive than Clarksville. The overall cost index is 90.8 vs 90.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Rochester equals $100K in Clarksville?
A $100,000 salary in Clarksville has the same purchasing power as $99,861 in Rochester. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Clarksville and Rochester?
Rents in Clarksville are indexed at 73.8 while Rochester is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Rochester has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.