Chicago-Naperville-Elgin vs Jacksonville

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Jacksonville is 4% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.

4% less expensive

Jacksonville, FL is 4% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 99.5 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $96,032 in Jacksonville; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin) vs 99.5 (Jacksonville)
  • $100k in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin ≈ $96,032 purchasing power in Jacksonville
  • Goods drives the gap (-11.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:FL 103.6→99.5

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE IL × FL
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Jacksonville
99.5
Goods
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
Jacksonville
96.2
Services
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
Jacksonville
87.5
Rents
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0
Jacksonville
109.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Goods creates the largest separation: Jacksonville is 11.0 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Jacksonville, FL is 4% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.1-point overall gap.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is above 100 while Jacksonville is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $96,032 in Jacksonville as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, then replace the national basket with your own.

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
Jacksonville
99.5
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in Jacksonville for the same purchasing power:

In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin In Jacksonville Difference
$50,000 $48,016 $-1,984
$75,000 $72,024 $-2,976
$100,000 $96,032 $-3,968
$150,000 $144,047 $-5,953
$ in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin = in Jacksonville

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 99.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Jacksonville more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

Jacksonville is 4% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 99.5 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Jacksonville equals $100K in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $96,032 in Jacksonville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Jacksonville?

Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while Jacksonville is at 109.8 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.