Overall
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 103.6
- Bozeman
- 102.5
Diff -1.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Bozeman is 1% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.
Bozeman, MT is 1% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 102.5 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $98,953 in Bozeman; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair IL:MT 103.6→102.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN and Bozeman, MT are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Bozeman is 27.2 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin corresponds to $98,953 in Bozeman.
Diff -1.1 RPP
Diff -11.3 RPP
Diff -9.9 RPP
Diff +27.2 RPP
| Category | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | Bozeman | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.6 | 102.5 | -1.1 |
| Goods | 107.3 | 96.0 | -11.3 |
| Services | 83.6 | 73.6 | -9.9 |
| Rents | 112.0 | 139.2 | +27.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in Bozeman for the same purchasing power:
| In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | In Bozeman | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,476 | $-524 |
| $75,000 | $74,214 | $-786 |
| $100,000 | $98,953 | $-1,047 |
| $150,000 | $148,429 | $-1,571 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 102.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Bozeman is 1% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 102.5 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $98,953 in Bozeman. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while Bozeman is at 139.2 (national average = 100). Bozeman has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.