Overall
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 103.6
- Boston-Cambridge-Newton
- 108.3
Diff +4.7 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Boston-Cambridge-Newton is 4.5% more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH is 4.5% more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 108.3 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $104,509 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair IL:MA 103.6→108.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +4.7 RPP
Diff -7.6 RPP
Diff +65.2 RPP
Diff +36.4 RPP
| Category | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | Boston-Cambridge-Newton | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.6 | 108.3 | +4.7 |
| Goods | 107.3 | 99.7 | -7.6 |
| Services | 83.6 | 148.8 | +65.2 |
| Rents | 112.0 | 148.4 | +36.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Boston-Cambridge-Newton is 65.2 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH is 4.5% more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.7-point overall gap.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin to $104,509 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in Boston-Cambridge-Newton for the same purchasing power:
| In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | In Boston-Cambridge-Newton | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,254 | +$2,254 |
| $75,000 | $78,382 | +$3,382 |
| $100,000 | $104,509 | +$4,509 |
| $150,000 | $156,763 | +$6,763 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 108.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Boston-Cambridge-Newton is 4.5% more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 108.3 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $104,509 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while Boston-Cambridge-Newton is at 148.4 (national average = 100). Boston-Cambridge-Newton has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.