Overall
- Chattanooga
- 91.5
- Spartanburg
- 91.1
Diff -0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Spartanburg is 0.5% less expensive than Chattanooga.
Spartanburg, SC is 0.5% less expensive than Chattanooga, TN-GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.1 vs 91.5). A $100,000 salary in Chattanooga buys about the same as $99,548 in Spartanburg; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair TN:SC 91.5→91.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Chattanooga, TN-GA and Spartanburg, SC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Spartanburg is 14.1 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Chattanooga to $99,548 in Spartanburg, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.4 RPP
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff +14.1 RPP
Diff -8.5 RPP
| Category | Chattanooga | Spartanburg | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.5 | 91.1 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 96.3 | +0.3 |
| Services | 74.2 | 88.3 | +14.1 |
| Rents | 76.5 | 68.0 | -8.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Chattanooga would need to be in Spartanburg for the same purchasing power:
| In Chattanooga | In Spartanburg | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,774 | $-226 |
| $75,000 | $74,661 | $-339 |
| $100,000 | $99,548 | $-452 |
| $150,000 | $149,323 | $-677 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.5 → 91.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Spartanburg is 0.5% less expensive than Chattanooga. The overall cost index is 91.1 vs 91.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Chattanooga has the same purchasing power as $99,548 in Spartanburg. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Chattanooga are indexed at 76.5 while Spartanburg is at 68.0 (national average = 100). Chattanooga has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.