Overall
- Chattanooga
- 91.5
- Lincoln
- 91.6
Diff +0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lincoln is 0.1% more expensive than Chattanooga.
Lincoln, NE is 0.1% more expensive than Chattanooga, TN-GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.6 vs 91.5). A $100,000 salary in Chattanooga buys about the same as $100,128 in Lincoln; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair TN:NE 91.5→91.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Chattanooga, TN-GA and Lincoln, NE are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Lincoln is 7.7 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Chattanooga corresponds to $100,128 in Lincoln.
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff -1.9 RPP
Diff +2.6 RPP
Diff +7.7 RPP
| Category | Chattanooga | Lincoln | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.5 | 91.6 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 94.1 | -1.9 |
| Services | 74.2 | 76.8 | +2.6 |
| Rents | 76.5 | 84.2 | +7.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Chattanooga and Lincoln share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 2.7 to 0.1 RPP points. Lincoln remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 4.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (2.3 to 2.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Chattanooga RPP | Lincoln RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.2 | 95.0 | 2.7 points Lincoln higher |
| 2012 | 94.4 | 93.8 | 0.6 points Chattanooga higher |
| 2016 | 93.8 | 93.3 | 0.5 points Chattanooga higher |
| 2020 | 90.1 | 95.2 | 5.2 points Lincoln higher |
| 2024 | 91.5 | 91.6 | 0.1 points Lincoln higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Chattanooga would need to be in Lincoln for the same purchasing power:
| In Chattanooga | In Lincoln | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,064 | +$64 |
| $75,000 | $75,096 | +$96 |
| $100,000 | $100,128 | +$128 |
| $150,000 | $150,192 | +$192 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.5 → 91.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lincoln is 0.1% more expensive than Chattanooga. The overall cost index is 91.6 vs 91.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Chattanooga has the same purchasing power as $100,128 in Lincoln. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Chattanooga are indexed at 76.5 while Lincoln is at 84.2 (national average = 100). Lincoln has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.