Overall
- Chattanooga
- 91.5
- Pueblo
- 91.8
Diff +0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Pueblo is 0.3% more expensive than Chattanooga.
Pueblo, CO is 0.3% more expensive than Chattanooga, TN-GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.8 vs 91.5). A $100,000 salary in Chattanooga buys about the same as $100,326 in Pueblo; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair TN:CO 91.5→91.8
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Chattanooga, TN-GA and Pueblo, CO are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Pueblo is 7.7 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Chattanooga to $100,326 in Pueblo, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff +7.7 RPP
Diff -5.3 RPP
| Category | Chattanooga | Pueblo | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.5 | 91.8 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 96.1 | +0.1 |
| Services | 74.2 | 81.9 | +7.7 |
| Rents | 76.5 | 71.3 | -5.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Chattanooga and Pueblo share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 0.9 to 0.3 RPP points. Pueblo remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 11.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (3.5 to 7.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Chattanooga RPP | Pueblo RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.2 | 91.4 | 0.9 points Chattanooga higher |
| 2012 | 94.4 | 96.2 | 1.8 points Pueblo higher |
| 2016 | 93.8 | 93.2 | 0.6 points Chattanooga higher |
| 2020 | 90.1 | 90.1 | 0.1 points Pueblo higher |
| 2024 | 91.5 | 91.8 | 0.3 points Pueblo higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Chattanooga would need to be in Pueblo for the same purchasing power:
| In Chattanooga | In Pueblo | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,163 | +$163 |
| $75,000 | $75,244 | +$244 |
| $100,000 | $100,326 | +$326 |
| $150,000 | $150,489 | +$489 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.5 → 91.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Pueblo is 0.3% more expensive than Chattanooga. The overall cost index is 91.8 vs 91.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Chattanooga has the same purchasing power as $100,326 in Pueblo. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Chattanooga are indexed at 76.5 while Pueblo is at 71.3 (national average = 100). Chattanooga has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.