Overall
- Chattanooga
- 91.5
Diff +6.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Prescott Valley-Prescott is 7.4% more expensive than Chattanooga.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 7.4% more expensive than Chattanooga, TN-GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 91.5). A $100,000 salary in Chattanooga buys about the same as $107,425 in Prescott Valley-Prescott; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair TN:AZ 91.5→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Chattanooga would need to be in Prescott Valley-Prescott for the same purchasing power:
| In Chattanooga | In Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,712 | +$3,712 |
| $75,000 | $80,569 | +$5,569 |
| $100,000 | $107,425 | +$7,425 |
| $150,000 | $161,137 | +$11,137 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.5 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 7.4% more expensive than Chattanooga, TN-GA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.8-point overall gap.
Rents leads the difference, with Prescott Valley-Prescott 22.2 points higher than Chattanooga. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Chattanooga corresponds to $107,425 in Prescott Valley-Prescott.
Diff +6.8 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff +17.2 RPP
Diff +22.2 RPP
| Category | Chattanooga | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.5 | 98.3 | +6.8 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 96.2 | +0.2 |
| Services | 74.2 | 91.5 | +17.2 |
| Rents | 76.5 | 98.8 | +22.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Chattanooga and Prescott Valley-Prescott share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 10.8 to 6.8 RPP points. Prescott Valley-Prescott remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 16.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (38.2 to 22.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Chattanooga RPP | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.2 | 103.0 | 10.8 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2012 | 94.4 | 96.5 | 2.1 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2016 | 93.8 | 98.6 | 4.8 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2020 | 90.1 | 93.2 | 3.1 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2024 | 91.5 | 98.3 | 6.8 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Prescott Valley-Prescott is 7.4% more expensive than Chattanooga. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 91.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Chattanooga has the same purchasing power as $107,425 in Prescott Valley-Prescott. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Chattanooga are indexed at 76.5 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is at 98.8 (national average = 100). Prescott Valley-Prescott has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.