Overall
- Chattanooga
- 91.5
- Mankato
- 91.0
Diff -0.5 RPP
Chattanooga vs Mankato
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Mankato is 0.6% less expensive than Chattanooga.
0.6% less expensive
Mankato, MN is 0.6% less expensive than Chattanooga, TN-GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.0 vs 91.5). A $100,000 salary in Chattanooga buys about the same as $99,443 in Mankato; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 91.5 (Chattanooga) vs 91.0 (Mankato)
- $100k in Chattanooga ≈ $99,443 purchasing power in Mankato
- Services drives the gap (+12.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair TN:MN 91.5→91.0
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE TN × MN
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Chattanooga
91.5
Cost Index
Mankato
91.0
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Chattanooga, TN-GA and Mankato, MN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Mankato is 12.8 points higher. But services and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Chattanooga to $99,443 in Mankato, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Chattanooga
- 96.0
- Mankato
- 95.4
Diff -0.6 RPP
Services
- Chattanooga
- 74.2
- Mankato
- 87.0
Diff +12.8 RPP
Rents
- Chattanooga
- 76.5
- Mankato
- 79.9
Diff +3.3 RPP
| Category | Chattanooga | Mankato | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.5 | 91.0 | -0.5 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 95.4 | -0.6 |
| Services | 74.2 | 87.0 | +12.8 |
| Rents | 76.5 | 79.9 | +3.3 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Chattanooga 91.5
Mankato 91.0
Goods
Chattanooga 96.0
Mankato 95.4
Services
Chattanooga 74.2
Mankato 87.0
Rents
Chattanooga 76.5
Mankato 79.9
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Chattanooga would need to be in Mankato for the same purchasing power:
| In Chattanooga | In Mankato | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,722 | $-278 |
| $75,000 | $74,583 | $-417 |
| $100,000 | $99,443 | $-557 |
| $150,000 | $149,165 | $-835 |
$ in Chattanooga = in Mankato
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.5 → 91.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Mankato more expensive than Chattanooga?
Mankato is 0.6% less expensive than Chattanooga. The overall cost index is 91.0 vs 91.5 (national average = 100).
What salary in Mankato equals $100K in Chattanooga?
A $100,000 salary in Chattanooga has the same purchasing power as $99,443 in Mankato. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Chattanooga and Mankato?
Rents in Chattanooga are indexed at 76.5 while Mankato is at 79.9 (national average = 100). Mankato has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.