Overall
- Cedar Rapids
- 89.0
- Tulsa
- 89.2
Diff +0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Tulsa is 0.3% more expensive than Cedar Rapids.
Tulsa, OK is 0.3% more expensive than Cedar Rapids, IA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 89.2 vs 89.0). A $100,000 salary in Cedar Rapids buys about the same as $100,282 in Tulsa; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair IA:OK 89.0→89.2
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Cedar Rapids, IA and Tulsa, OK are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Tulsa is 10.1 points lower. But services and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Cedar Rapids to $100,282 in Tulsa, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff +0.0 RPP
Diff -10.1 RPP
Diff -3.2 RPP
| Category | Cedar Rapids | Tulsa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 89.0 | 89.2 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 93.8 | +0.0 |
| Services | 84.0 | 73.9 | -10.1 |
| Rents | 71.4 | 68.2 | -3.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Cedar Rapids and Tulsa share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.0 to 0.3 RPP points. Tulsa remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 2.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (7.4 to 10.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Cedar Rapids RPP | Tulsa RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.9 | 92.9 | 0.0 points Cedar Rapids higher |
| 2012 | 93.7 | 94.2 | 0.4 points Tulsa higher |
| 2016 | 91.1 | 94.6 | 3.5 points Tulsa higher |
| 2020 | 91.2 | 91.7 | 0.4 points Tulsa higher |
| 2024 | 89.0 | 89.2 | 0.3 points Tulsa higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Cedar Rapids would need to be in Tulsa for the same purchasing power:
| In Cedar Rapids | In Tulsa | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,141 | +$141 |
| $75,000 | $75,212 | +$212 |
| $100,000 | $100,282 | +$282 |
| $150,000 | $150,423 | +$423 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (89.0 → 89.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Tulsa is 0.3% more expensive than Cedar Rapids. The overall cost index is 89.2 vs 89.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Cedar Rapids has the same purchasing power as $100,282 in Tulsa. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Cedar Rapids are indexed at 71.4 while Tulsa is at 68.2 (national average = 100). Cedar Rapids has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.