Overall
- Cedar Rapids
- 89.0
- Sierra Vista-Douglas
- 89.2
Diff +0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Sierra Vista-Douglas is 0.3% more expensive than Cedar Rapids.
Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ is 0.3% more expensive than Cedar Rapids, IA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 89.2 vs 89.0). A $100,000 salary in Cedar Rapids buys about the same as $100,315 in Sierra Vista-Douglas; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair IA:AZ 89.0→89.2
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Cedar Rapids, IA and Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Sierra Vista-Douglas is 9.5 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Cedar Rapids corresponds to $100,315 in Sierra Vista-Douglas.
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff +2.5 RPP
Diff +8.0 RPP
Diff -9.5 RPP
| Category | Cedar Rapids | Sierra Vista-Douglas | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 89.0 | 89.2 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 96.2 | +2.5 |
| Services | 84.0 | 91.9 | +8.0 |
| Rents | 71.4 | 61.9 | -9.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Cedar Rapids and Sierra Vista-Douglas share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.9 to 0.3 RPP points. Sierra Vista-Douglas remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 10.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (2.5 to 8.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Cedar Rapids RPP | Sierra Vista-Douglas RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.9 | 93.8 | 0.9 points Sierra Vista-Douglas higher |
| 2012 | 93.7 | 93.5 | 0.2 points Cedar Rapids higher |
| 2016 | 91.1 | 93.0 | 1.8 points Sierra Vista-Douglas higher |
| 2020 | 91.2 | 88.5 | 2.7 points Cedar Rapids higher |
| 2024 | 89.0 | 89.2 | 0.3 points Sierra Vista-Douglas higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Cedar Rapids would need to be in Sierra Vista-Douglas for the same purchasing power:
| In Cedar Rapids | In Sierra Vista-Douglas | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,157 | +$157 |
| $75,000 | $75,236 | +$236 |
| $100,000 | $100,315 | +$315 |
| $150,000 | $150,472 | +$472 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (89.0 → 89.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Sierra Vista-Douglas is 0.3% more expensive than Cedar Rapids. The overall cost index is 89.2 vs 89.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Cedar Rapids has the same purchasing power as $100,315 in Sierra Vista-Douglas. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Cedar Rapids are indexed at 71.4 while Sierra Vista-Douglas is at 61.9 (national average = 100). Cedar Rapids has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.