Overall
- Fresno
- 102.2
Diff +1.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Fresno is 1.2% more expensive than Burlington-South Burlington.
Fresno, CA is 1.2% more expensive than Burlington-South Burlington, VT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 102.2 vs 100.9). A $100,000 salary in Burlington-South Burlington buys about the same as $101,198 in Fresno; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair VT:CA 100.9→102.2
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Burlington-South Burlington, VT and Fresno, CA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Fresno is 35.5 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Burlington-South Burlington to $101,198 in Fresno, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +1.2 RPP
Diff +7.9 RPP
Diff +35.5 RPP
Diff -8.1 RPP
| Category | Burlington-South Burlington | Fresno | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 102.2 | +1.2 |
| Goods | 97.3 | 105.2 | +7.9 |
| Services | 125.5 | 161.0 | +35.5 |
| Rents | 103.8 | 95.7 | -8.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Burlington-South Burlington would need to be in Fresno for the same purchasing power:
| In Burlington-South Burlington | In Fresno | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,599 | +$599 |
| $75,000 | $75,898 | +$898 |
| $100,000 | $101,198 | +$1,198 |
| $150,000 | $151,796 | +$1,796 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.9 → 102.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Fresno is 1.2% more expensive than Burlington-South Burlington. The overall cost index is 102.2 vs 100.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Burlington-South Burlington has the same purchasing power as $101,198 in Fresno. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Burlington-South Burlington are indexed at 103.8 while Fresno is at 95.7 (national average = 100). Burlington-South Burlington has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.