Overall
- Brunswick-St. Simons
- 87.7
- Rocky Mount
- 88.0
Diff +0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rocky Mount is 0.3% more expensive than Brunswick-St. Simons.
Rocky Mount, NC is 0.3% more expensive than Brunswick-St. Simons, GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.0 vs 87.7). A $100,000 salary in Brunswick-St. Simons buys about the same as $100,347 in Rocky Mount; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair GA:NC 87.7→88.0
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Brunswick-St. Simons, GA and Rocky Mount, NC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Rocky Mount is 1.1 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Brunswick-St. Simons to $100,347 in Rocky Mount, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff +1.1 RPP
Diff -0.2 RPP
| Category | Brunswick-St. Simons | Rocky Mount | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.7 | 88.0 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 96.3 | 96.6 | +0.4 |
| Services | 87.3 | 88.4 | +1.1 |
| Rents | 56.3 | 56.1 | -0.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Brunswick-St. Simons and Rocky Mount share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.5 to 0.3 RPP points. Rocky Mount remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 13.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (13.5 to 0.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Brunswick-St. Simons RPP | Rocky Mount RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 88.2 | 88.7 | 0.5 points Rocky Mount higher |
| 2012 | 89.9 | 89.1 | 0.9 points Brunswick-St. Simons higher |
| 2016 | 89.2 | 87.8 | 1.4 points Brunswick-St. Simons higher |
| 2020 | 89.0 | 83.8 | 5.1 points Brunswick-St. Simons higher |
| 2024 | 87.7 | 88.0 | 0.3 points Rocky Mount higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Brunswick-St. Simons would need to be in Rocky Mount for the same purchasing power:
| In Brunswick-St. Simons | In Rocky Mount | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,173 | +$173 |
| $75,000 | $75,260 | +$260 |
| $100,000 | $100,347 | +$347 |
| $150,000 | $150,520 | +$520 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.7 → 88.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Rocky Mount is 0.3% more expensive than Brunswick-St. Simons. The overall cost index is 88.0 vs 87.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Brunswick-St. Simons has the same purchasing power as $100,347 in Rocky Mount. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Brunswick-St. Simons are indexed at 56.3 while Rocky Mount is at 56.1 (national average = 100). Brunswick-St. Simons has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.