Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard vs Boston-Cambridge-Newton

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Boston-Cambridge-Newton is 2.5% more expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard.

2.5% more expensive

Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH is 2.5% more expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 108.3 vs 105.6). A $100,000 salary in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard buys about the same as $102,518 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 105.6 (Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard) vs 108.3 (Boston-Cambridge-Newton)
  • $100k in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard ≈ $102,518 purchasing power in Boston-Cambridge-Newton
  • Services drives the gap (+56.7 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WA:MA 105.6→108.3

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE WA × MA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
105.6
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
108.3
Goods
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
105.0
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
99.7
Services
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
92.0
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
148.8
Rents
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
129.6
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
148.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Services creates the largest separation: Boston-Cambridge-Newton is 56.7 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH is 2.5% more expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.7-point overall gap.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard to $102,518 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
105.6
Cost Index
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
108.3
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard would need to be in Boston-Cambridge-Newton for the same purchasing power:

In Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard In Boston-Cambridge-Newton Difference
$50,000 $51,259 +$1,259
$75,000 $76,888 +$1,888
$100,000 $102,518 +$2,518
$150,000 $153,777 +$3,777
$ in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard = in Boston-Cambridge-Newton

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (105.6 → 108.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Boston-Cambridge-Newton more expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard?

Boston-Cambridge-Newton is 2.5% more expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard. The overall cost index is 108.3 vs 105.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Boston-Cambridge-Newton equals $100K in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard?

A $100,000 salary in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard has the same purchasing power as $102,518 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard and Boston-Cambridge-Newton?

Rents in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard are indexed at 129.6 while Boston-Cambridge-Newton is at 148.4 (national average = 100). Boston-Cambridge-Newton has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.